![]() |
|||||
|
Santee Cooper Lakes Waterfowl and Fisheries Coalition Update A Coalition Update Wetland Wildlife Center, SCWA November 11, 2003 6:30 p.m. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. at the South Carolina Waterfowl Association Wetland Wildlife Center by Chairman Joey Moore. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Update Joey introduced Billy McTeer, Deputy Director, Wildlife & Freshwater Fisheries, SC DNR. Billy started his presentation with an overview of the status of South Carolina DNR. He mentioned that DNR is completing its restructuring due to budget cuts. They have reduced their offices from 17 down to 4 regional offices located in Charleston, Florence, Columbia and Clemson. Billy introduced Derrell Shipes who has changed his position to Director of Research and Survey. Tim Ivey is now in charge of management on all Wildlife Management Areas. Billy noted that DNR had taken the highest budget cut of any agency and they are expecting an additional 7% cut in the budget. Billy asked Derrell Shipes to review our Santee Cooper Lakes Plan. Derrell started with an update on the Hickory Top project which is outlined in the plan. They are beginning construction on this project in mid November. Construction was delayed due to high water in the lake and extremely wet conditions over the past year. The project will be finished sometime next year depending on weather and it may not be hunted next season. They will make this determination at a later date. Derrell reviewed the plant management plans for the Santee Cooper Lakes. He encouraged the Coalition to work with DNR and the Santee Cooper to help develop a vegetative management and restoration plan for the Santee Cooper Lakes. Derrell reported that the hatchery management area would be difficult to restore due to navigatability laws. It would be almost impossible to get Army Corps permits. The hatchery project would also be extremely expensive to maintain. David Wielicki noted the Smythe property as a possible alternative to the hatchery project and mentioned its possible addition as a state wildlife management area. DNR is looking into this property. Derrell Shipes also gave cost estimates on the following projects listed in the Santee Cooper Lakes Waterfowl & Fisheries Restoration Plan. He noted that DNR thought each of these portions of the plan had merit. Submerged aquatic vegetation on Santee Cooper Lakes. The current policy is to allow the development of 17,000 acres of native submerged vegetation which would be beneficial to waterfowl and other wildlife. This development would inevitably lead to the need for herbicide treatment around developed areas including homes, boat landings and businesses. The estimated cost for these chemicals is $250,000 per year. Treatment of encroaching emergent weeds in shallow areas. Southern wild rice has become a problem in shallow areas. Treatment of this species will provide the opportunity for beneficial species like smartweed and watershield to develop. This estimated cost for chemicals associated with this activity is $60,000 per year. Investigation and restoration of beneficial hardwoods in the upper Santee swamp. Investigations of the history of beneficial hardwoods in this area should be initiated. Further assistance should be sought from experts from other areas. Efforts should be undertaken to reestablish hardwoods (particularly oaks) in this area. The estimated cost for this effort is $250,000. Grass carp exclusion from natural areas. The exclusion of the grass carp from identified natural areas will allow submerged aquatic vegetation to develop in isolated areas which will be used by waterfowl and other wildlife. These devices will be a deterrent to navigation and represent significant permitting problems. Assuming the necessary permits can be acquired, the estimated cost for 17 areas is $500,000. Fish attraction structures. The development and placement of large scale fish attraction devices would provide additional habitats for aquatic organisms including fish and would provide focal points for fishing. The devices should be large in scale and dispersed throughout the system. The design and estimated cost for these devices is not available at this time. |
|
||||